Biden’s America is rapidly disintegrated to one of its most divided states in decades, and it appears that the ultra-woke, elitist universities are absolutely thrilled at the prospect of becoming even more disunited themselves.

After all, these institutions were well known for coddling students after the “horror” of Trump’s win in 2016, with several of the snowflakes excused from exams, if not classes altogether, to deal with the apparent traumas of representative government and corresponding elections.

On top of that, these dastardly universities are also well-known for promoting various absurd theories, from “White Privilege” to virtually any other divisive concept that one can think of.

Thus, determining the most leftist of leftist universities can be a real challenge it comes to the most leftist of leftist universities, considering how far all of them have been lurching for quite some time.

However, Columbia University just may have topped them all with its rather startling announcement about upcoming graduation ceremonies. Namely, the segregated ceremonies. That is correct: segregated.

Included amongst the variously segregated ceremonies? Apparently, Columbia has decided to offer the following services in the following order, spanning from April 25 to April 30: “Native Graduation,” “Lavender Graduation (LGBTQIA+ community,” “Asian Graduation,” “FLI Graduation (First-generation and/or low income community)”, “LatinX Graduation,” and “Black Graduation.”

Needless to say, this plan is asinine enough, especially since multiple students may not fit neatly into the customized graduation boxes that Columbia University has predesigned for them. For instance, what if a student identifies as “LatinX” and “Black” due to mixed race parents? What about Asians who also identify as “FLI?” Are these students entitled to two ceremonies?

Moreover, given the noted absence of “White Graduation,” are all the whites apparently being segregated into the “main” graduation ceremony, as if to create some perverse “White Privilege” entirely of the university’s making?

Don’t expect any honesty from Columbia University, which provided a rather uninspiring response for its segregated ceremonies.

“Complementing our school- and University-wide ceremonies, these events provide a more intimate setting for students and guests to gather, incorporate meaningful cultural traditions and celebrate the specific contributions and achievements of their communities.” [Source: The Blaze]

Ah. So what most people would call “segregated,” Columbia University calls “intimate.”

Some of this stuff just simply cannot even be made up anymore, given that the leftists’ ever divisive imaginations will continually dream up more and more nonsense.

Anything to divide.

The greatest irony upon ironies, of course, is that many American universities have become so fixated on being more woke than their peers that they have declined to realize, or, more accurately, acknowledge, the very real national security threats seeping throughout college campuses now.

China has been quietly peddling its influence as universities have become louder and louder on the leftist front, and it is safe to say that China has no personal interest in segregated graduation ceremonies or any other nonsense activities that a university may be engaged with.

In addition, universities also employ many Chinese nationals, some of whom have already been caught for lying on their applications about ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), from the East Coast to the West Coast.

Most recently, for instance, a Stanford university professor was recently caught for concealing ties to the Chinese government, though that same professor had clearly been involved in a top-tier school for some time.

John Brown, who is the executive assistant director of the FBI’s National Security Branch, commented on the rather apparent exploitation of American universities after the Stanford incident.

“[This] announcement shows the extreme lengths to which the Chinese government has gone to infiltrate and exploit America’s benevolence.”
[Source: Palo Alto]

So, in other words, universities turn a blind eye to literal national security risks, all while creating great internal division on their own, from “free speech zones” to apparently segregated graduation ceremonies.

One can only hope that these universities eventually lose their luster and prestige, especially since it seems that the only types of skills “graduates” are developing are social justice warrior skills … Which means very few skills overall.

Stay tuned to see if other universities elect to follow Columbia’s woke lead …

The vulnerability of the border for terrorists has been a significant national security concern for years. Various terrorists have exploited the ongoing crisis at the border in order to enter the United States and begin planning chaos on American soil. This exploitation is particularly effective for terrorists when the border is in a state of crisis, which is now.

The migrant camps are overwhelmed in terms of capacity, COVId is spreading rampantly, and the Democrats have largely ignored these outcomes. Much of the motivation for ignoring the crisis is political in nature; however, such motivation has also led to terrorists having greater ease to access the United States.

Recently, news broke that four individuals on the United States’ terror watch list were arrested at the border, including three individuals from Yemen and one individual from Serbia.

As noted by Axios, the United States Customs and Border Protection agency revealed to Congress that four of the individuals arrested at the border since October 1 have names that match the FBI’s Screening Database. This watchlist is long and extensive, and it consists of people who are “known to be or reasonably suspected to be involved in terrorist activities.”

In addition, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has also stopped more than 3,700 individuals on the watchlist from entering the nation in fiscal 2017,  which ended on September 30, 2017.

Various journalists have visited the border and observed the crisis firsthand, which is taking place on both sides of the border. All the detention centers are swelled to capacity, and arrests of illegal immigrants have surpassed 100,000 in February.

The border situation has rapidly devolved into a humanitarian crisis of Biden’s own making, as well as a serious national security concern issue. Most concerning of all, it is likely that at least a few terrorists may have already slipped through, with others likely to follow under the current administration.

The 2020 presidential election has fraud cases that remain active in the court system. Per official data, 18 of the 83 fraud cases filed regarding the 2020 election remain active. Nonetheless, the vast majority of inactive cases were not examined by the courts.

21 of the 83 cases were merit-based, and the GOP and former President Trump won 14 of these. The active lawsuits are taking place across 11 states, with the majority of them taking place in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

This news arrived after the Supreme Court declined to hear numerous lawsuits related tot he election in February, which emerged from potential election fraud in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona. However, the high court declined to provide justification for why it rejected the more controversial cases filed by Sidney Powell, a U.S. attorney, in Pennsylvania.

Powell remarked that evidence regarding the electronic manipulation of ballots was available, which led to thousands of ballots remaining uncounted across multiple states.

Powell explained that by conducting “forensic evaluations of the machines” and examining “all of the paper ballots,” it becomes clear that the numbers will not align.

She alleges that the same counterfeit ballot was run through the same counting machine repeatedly, which means, “you’re going to get the same result,” Powell continued.

Per the Heritage Foundation, over 1,300 cases of proven voter fraud, including more than 1,100 convictions, have occurred in recent years.

Since Biden has assumed office, it seems like literally nothing has flown out of his office aside from a slew of executive orders, whose purpose can be boiled down into just two words: America Last.

After all, open borders, job killing, and school closures seem to be at the top of Democrats’ wish lists, along with funding massive entitlement programs, and apparently now reparations via racialized federal aid.

At some point, however, even Democrats have to somewhat come down to reality and realize that a certain amount of “revenue” is needed to effectively give millions of illegals citizenship, not to mention let millions more illegals stream through the border.

Oh, and don’t forget the rather obvious attempt to test out “universal income” with nonstop unemployment, despite the economy beginning to rebound. Much to authoritarian leftists’ dismay, particularly those who just love to lockdown everyone. Massive revenue is also needed from somewhere to continue paying people not to work.

Unsurprisingly, it looks like Biden has finally gotten around to doing what the Democrats do best: Tax more, spend even more; tax even more, spend even more; and repeat again and again and again.

Too bad that Biden has to take things to the extreme, again, by proposing the largest tax hike since 1993. What wonderful news for companies and individuals when the economy is just beginning to pick up once more.

Under this plan, Biden is expected to significantly increase corporate tax rates, as well as individual rates for those making $400,000 or more per year. Furthermore, Biden is also expected to increase capital gains rate taxes, further eating into wealth that someone has worked hard to accumulate for themselves, their families, and their communities.

After all, Biden’s tax plan isn’t directly attacking innumerable heirs and heiresses; instead, it is assaulting business owners and those who provide economic lifeblood to other Americans in the form of jobs, as well as desired products and services.

And while the nonworking leftists may cheer about the fact that “the rich” are getting hit with taxes, they might think a little differently the next time they swoop into a 7-11 to buy cigarettes or roll up to the petrol station to purchase gasoline.

Adding additional taxation to businesses ultimately means that the real bottom line, consumers, are hurt. Businesses will increase prices to offset paying more useless tax to the federal government, and job-seeking individuals will find fewer opportunities available as businesses will hire fewer people.

In other words, for politicians who are clearly averse to the study of economics, it would be useful for them to research all the “dead weight losses” repeatedly associated with taxation, which effectively means that they strangle the economy for no coherent reason. Curiously, a core economic concept never uttered by some elitist Ivy League “economist” who “advises” economically illiterate liberals.

Most hilariously of all, this tax hike is presumably designed to balance a supposed imbalance between “work and wealth,” according to Biden’s illustrious former economic aide, Sarah Bianchi.

“His whole outlook has always been that Americans believe tax policy needs to be fair, and he has viewed all of his policy options through that lens … That is why the focus is on addressing the unequal treatment between work and wealth.” [Source: News Max]

Interesting perspective, Ms. Bianchi. Except quite a few Americans receiving the benefits of these tax revenues (for that matter, non-American illegal immigrants) do not appear to have put in the requisite “work” needed to acquire “wealth.”

On the contrary, they’re screaming for reparations and everything else under the sun all while refusing to work, attend school, and all the other activities that are necessary for a highly prosperous economy.

Which is precisely why more than one conservative has spoken out about the proposed tax increases, including even Mr. McConnell, who has decided to shift his focus away from Trump for once, though he didn’t sound as convincing as possible.

“We’ll have a big robust discussion about the appropriateness of a big tax increase.” [Source: News Max]

Interesting news, McConnell. Let’s hope that “big robust discussion” actually leads to somewhere useful. Like beyond a “discussion” and into action.

Fortunately, other conservative commentators on Twitter, clearly those who are less concerned with appearing politically correct, called out Biden’s plan for exactly what it is (heavy dose of sarcasm included).

“Wow what a great idea—let’s hike taxes while our American families are struggling to recover from a global pandemic, after eliminating near 50k energy related jobs overnight and while gas prices creep near $4/gallon. Brilliant.” [Source: Townhall]

Brilliant, indeed. Brilliantly flawed.

One can only hope McConnell and others prevent the Democrats from further upending Americans’ lives, and one can only really hope that Trump and his allies truly will swoop in and save America.

The GOP Party of Alabama gave a special gift to former President Donald Trump: a framed resolution that proclaims him to be “one of the greatest” presidents in the history of the United States. 

Enjoying an unanimous passing, this resolution openly declares that Trump achieved vastly more in 48 months than Biden achieved over 48 years as a Senator and Vice-President.

Trump received the special gift at Mar-a-Lago over the weekend.

Perry Hooper, Jr., who is a former representative, detailed to Fox News how the resolution “talks about the greatness of Donald J. Trump, how he made America great again.”

Hopper also remarked that he hoped that other states would follow the lead of Trump. 

Hopper also noted that Trump has done many “great things” for the nation over the course of the past four years, including “building up our military,” “creating the best economy ever,” “bringing back American manufacturing,” and “cutting taxes.”

The special gift was presented to Trump shortly after he had teased the idea of running for president again in 2024.

At that time, Trump remarked that “I may even decide to beat them for a third time,” in reference to the Democrats.

In addition, Trump was the winner in the CPAC’s straw poll regarding possible 2024 candidates, receiving 55 percent of the vote from those in attendance.

Hopper remarked that Alabama loves Trump and American loves Trump, which is precisely why Trump received 75 million votes from Americans.

It’s taken weeks and weeks and weeks for the Democrats to finally acknowledge challenges at the border, challenges that virtually any common sense American, and for that matter, Trump, warned about ever since last year.

Unfortunately, the Democrats threw out the welcome wagon for hordes of illegal immigrants to start marching towards the border before 2020 even ended. Consequently, numerous Americans looked on in dismay to see Biden shirt-wearing migrants predictably storming towards the border in January.

While the Biden administration and “Circle Back” Psaki continued to dodge various, very relevant questions regarding the border crisis, it looks like some ultra-leftists have finally come around to the realization that they should probably acknowledge the severe challenges overwhelming the border, all due to Democrat insanity.

Too bad that when Democrats decide to recognize an issue at the border, they fail to look at the facts and instead deign to go with their feelings. Starting with one of the greatest drama queens of them all, Ms. Pelosi.

In news that is surprising, yet also unsurprising, Pelosi has decided to blame Trump for the current border crisis. Yes, she is making this claim in spite of the fact that various officials have stated that the border had been more secure under Trump than it had in decades with anyone else.

Not to mention the fact that the states actually dealing with the border crisis, like Texas, have explicitly called out Biden’s administration for the increasing chaos at the border, with State AG Ken Paxton and Governor Greg Abbott coming to mind, along with various other individuals who are decidedly unimpressed with Biden’s imaginary utopia at the border.

Then again, since Pelosi never bothers to listen to anyone but herself and her yes people anyway, she may have never bothered to even tune in to the remarks made by Paxton and Abbott.

Instead, she just goes to her predictable punching bag: Trump. Which she did with great melodrama during a recent appearance on ABC.

“The facts of these, there are more children, about 600, 700 more children, unaccompanied children coming over the border … This is a humanitarian challenge to all of us …

What the administration has inherited is a broken system at the border, and they are working to correct that in the children’s interest … I’m so pleased that the president, as a temporary measure, has sent FEMA to the border in order to help facilitate the children going from one — the 72-hour issue into where they are cared for as they are transferred into family homes or homes that are safe for them to be …

So this, again, is a transition for what was wrong before to what is right.” [Source: The Blaze]

“A transition for what is wrong before to what is right.” Is Pelosi for real? How “wrong” could Trump have been if Biden is using the exact same type of assistance that Trump did, including the so-called “cages” that are now apparently “homes” under the Biden administration.

Furthermore, Ms. Pelosi, something else “wrong” is to openly extend an invitation to Central America, welcoming an invasion of the border, and then turn around and loudly complain about a humanitarian crisis. Which is immediately blamed on Trump.

And, like the ultra-leftist she is, Pelosi couldn’t resist blaming climate change for the border crisis as well, though she paid brief passing attention to “corruption” and “violence” before spending the majority of her time railing about climate change.

“My most recent trip to the Northern Triangle, that would be Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, you saw the impact of the climate change, mind you … These people were leaving because of the drought. They couldn’t farm and they were seeking other ways to survive.” [Source: The Blaze]

Right, ok, Pelosi. That’s surely the reason all of these individuals are marching to the border … over not being able to farm. Also, way to pass judgment on the entire region of Central America, based upon one single observation of “climate change.”

For that matter, Pelosi did not bother to elaborate further on climate change she supposedly saw; people are apparently supposed to just accept “the impact” now, without even hearing some commentary about dryness, lack of rain, or any other complaint that supposedly indicates humanity has the sole power to destroy the planet.

So, between blaming Trump and blaming climate change, one can only wonder what Pelosi might blame next for the inevitable mess headed the Democrats’ way …

Well now that the border is in chaos, jobs have been killed, and Harris has been making foreign calls on behalf of the current president, Democrats have turned their claws onto yet another longstanding American constitutional right, namely the right to bear arms in the Second Amendment.

And the attack on the Second Amendment was quick and highly aggressive, judging from not one, but two bills that were passed on gun control by the House yesterday.

The House passed the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021, also known as the H.R. 8 bill, in a 227-203 vote; this bill is most well-known for requiring background checks on all U.S. firearms purchases. In addition, the House also succeeded in passing the Enhanced Background Check Act, also known as H.R. 1446, which would extend the time that the federal government has available to conduct background searches.

Needless to say, Senate Majority leader Chuck Schumer is beyond gleeful over this turn of events, which he just could not resist spewing about in public.

“In the past, when they sent it over to us last time, it went into [former Senate Majority Leader] Mitch McConnell’s legislative graveyard … The legislative graveyard is over. H.R. 8 will be on the floor of the Senate, and we will see where everybody stands. No more hopes and prayers, thoughts and prayers. A vote is what we need, a vote, not thoughts and prayers.” [Source: Fox News]

And, in line with Schumer’s typical behavior, he continued boasting about the success of his past attacks on the Second Amendment, including those from nearly thirty years ago (term limits, anyone?).

Regardless, since term limits apparently won’t be arriving anytime soon (talk about “privilege”), it is safe to say that the ultra-leftist politicians will continue to brag about their “achievements” from decades ago.

Then proceed to point out “loopholes” from before that apparently require even more 2nd Amendment-restricting bills no.w

“Certainly hundreds of thousands — maybe millions — of people walking the streets today because we passed [the 1994 Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act] would be dead … But when we passed the law, little did we know, it had some loopholes in it that we didn’t know at the time. We didn’t know there would be an internet, so we didn’t prohibit internet sales without a background check.” [Source: Fox News]

Well, nice to see you have all your bases covered, Mr. Schumer. You didn’t “know” there would be an Internet in the 1990s (hey, didn’t Gore “invent the Internet,” anyway?), which means you have yet another excuse to pass even more restrictive measures later on.

Schumer, who is the unsurprising author of aforementioned 1994 Brady Handgun Violence and Prevention Act, certainly seems just as pleased with himself now as he was then.

And Schumer was hardly the only one to weigh in. While Schumer was busy bragging about himself, Pelosi was busy bragging about all the “bipartisan” support she supposedly enjoys.

Pelosi, as predictable as always, trumpeted her own horn while proclaiming the “bipartisan” nature of the bill.

“There is nobody in Congress whose political survival is more important than the survival of our children. We think this should be bipartisan to Congress, as it is in the country. Overwhelmingly, there is broad support for background checks legislation, so we hope with the big strong bipartisan vote we have today to send it over the Senate, the drumbeat across America, that the change will come.” [Source: Breitbart]
Interesting, Pelosi. If this bill is so wonderful, then why did virtually all Republicans vote against both gun control measures?

Hardly seems “bipartisan,” but since Democrats apparently consider themselves the entirety of the nation’s political representation, “bipartisan” and “partisan” likely mean the same.

One can only hope that the Democrats will not yet make other absurd restrictions, but at the rate they’re going, they may well be trying to abolish the 2nd Amendment in its entirety at some point …

Governor Tate Reeves of Mississippi, along with Governor Greg Abbott of Texas and Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida, share numerous characteristics in common, from supporting Trump to supporting freedom (really, one and the same under Trump’s real leadership).

As a result of supporting freedom, not to mention strongly advocating for individual states’ rights, these governors, as well as several other likeminded governors, have not become enormous fans of Biden’s nonstop executive orders, to put it mildly, as every single one of the inane orders seems to bizarrely advocate an “America Last” approach.

Well, fortunately for the residents of conservative states, governors remain unimpressed by “America Last” and have boldly stood up to Biden in several different ways, from challenging immigration policies in Texas to travel policies in Florida.

Now, Governor Reeves of Mississippi has taken serious aim at Biden’s nonsensical transgender sports executive orders (for teenagers who aren’t even attending school), an executive order that was so critically important that it had to apparently be passed on Day 1.

Which Reeves remained amazed by.

“Now, I never would have envisioned on Inauguration Day 2020 that we would be here this morning. In fact, I never envisioned on Inauguration Day 2021 that we would be here this morning. But for the fact that President Biden, as one of his first initiatives, sat down and signed an executive order which in my view encourages transgenderism amongst our young people.” [Source: Fox News]

Sadly, Biden did make that bill one of his first initiatives, which is precisely why Reeves has taken fierce action against such an absurd executive order, namely by protecting families of Mississippi from seriously frightening leftist demands.

With SB 2536, a bill that Reeves signed into law this past Thursday, will ensure that biological females are protected during sports, in that they will not be forced to compete against biological males.

“But for the fact that President Biden as one of his first initiatives sat down and signed an executive order — which, in my opinion, encourages transgenderism amongst our young people — but for that fact, we wouldn’t be here today … [this bill will] protect young girls from being forced to compete with biological males for athletic opportunities.” [Source: The Washington Examiner]

Absolutely correct, Reeves. Thank you for looking out for American families, not to mention a semblance of American order.

Needless to say, more than one American is not very happy about the prospect of their biological female daughters being tackled to the ground by biological males, which is precisely why fierce resistance has built up against Biden’s overly “inclusive” regime.

Plus, Biden’s transgender policy would ironically weaken females, rather than strengthen them, as noted by Christiana Holcomb, an attorney for Alliance Defending Freedom.

“When we ignore science and biological reality, female athletes lose medals, podium spots, public recognition, and opportunities to compete.”
[Source: The Washington Examiner]

Which is precisely what Reeves aimed for in his bill, and he was unafraid to make his feelings known (he was also, very fortunately, unafraid to use the horribly “offensive” gendered terminology these days.

“This important piece of legislation will ensure that young girls in Mississippi have a fair, level playing field in public school sports … It sends a clear message to my daughters and all of Mississippi’s daughters that their rights are worth fighting for.” [Source: Fox News]

The woke mob will likely be after Reeves next for daring to say “daughters.”

In fact, the mob is already after Reeves to a degree, when considering the commentary from Alphonso David, the President of the Human Rights Campaign.

“This law is a solution in search of a problem, and legislators in Mississippi have not provided any examples of Mississippi transgender athletes gaming the system for a competitive advantage because none exist.” [Source: Fox News]

Really, Mr. David? Has it ever occurred to you that no historical examples of “competitive advantage” can be found because the lunacy of transgender sports was never seriously implemented until now, at least on a federal level?

Not exactly the most compelling observation in the world offered by the left … but then again, what is?

Everyone knew that Kamala bailing out violent BLM thugs and Biden openly calling for investigations into the police (without mentioning any accountability whatsoever on the criminals’ parts) would be a very bad idea. After all, what worse way to achieve “unity” than to directly or indirectly applaud BLM, which has absolutely zero interest in unity of any kind?

For that matter, zero interest in the United States of any kind, considering that the militant movement, along with Antifa, are clearly fixated on turning the United States into a completely unrecognizable nation.

Starting with the continuous establishment of “autonomous zones,” where police are banned and crime flourishes. Recalling the disaster of Seattle’s CHOP zone last year, wherein a teenager tragically died (and the Mayor of Seattle couldn’t be deigned to contact the family of the victim, though Trump himself did).

However, it looks like the leftists are gearing up for another even more volatile “autonomous zone”: One that is conveniently set up just in time for the officers facing various charges over the passing of George Floyd last spring.

Branter Smith, a retired Sergeant and current spokeswoman for the National Police Association has detailed the autonomous zone that has now sprung up in Minneapolis, Minnesota, just in time for the beginning stages of the trial for the officers involved with George Floyd.

“George Floyd Square is now an autonomous zone. They just had a homicide there … There are businesses especially near the Third Precinct — that was allowed to burn down — that get robbed by the same people two to three times a week. There are citizens who just can’t get police service.” [Source: Fox News]

Apparently, this six block area also has a “no White people” allowed rule, which hardly sounds like unity but frankly sounds even more like dangerous discord and serious violence.

And, on top of the “no White people” rule, police are apparently totally barred from entering as well, which means that they will be unable to help someone in true need of assistance, even if the individual is literally dying.

Smith highlights the grim reality of those unfortunately trapped in living within this autonomous zone, as they did not exactly get a vote either.

“The police are literally barricaded from going in there … It’s very frustrating because it’s already a very disadvantaged area to begin with. Then, of course, last May and into the summer, there were the riots that further decimated it, and now you have this area where the police — who are already short-staffed — aren’t allowed to go in.” [Source: Fox News]

It is not only very frustrating, but it is also incredibly dangerous to public safety. After all, Minneapolis, the city council of which idiotically voted to defund police last year (while retaining private security for themselves), is already a powder keg due to the upcoming trial of the police officers.

And, like the classic, havoc-loving leftists they are, BLM and Antifa are chomping at the bit to create even more havoc for the law-abiding citizens who still remain in Minneapolis. Plus, crime has been on the rise in Minnesota ever since the political representatives thought it would be a great idea to defund police.

Until a brief last year shattered that police-free utopia that politicians dreamed up.

“Without the adequate number of police officers as the police force, the current Minneapolis public safety crisis will continue to no one’s benefit.”
[Source: Fox News]

Uh, yeah. That could be determined without some massive formal study. Nonetheless, it’s at least nice to see some sanity in writing, as opposed to all the gibberish over defunding the police.

Biden and Kamala, of course, have the opportunity to send in the National Guard to Minneapolis, which would frankly be a much better use of National Guard members than the ones lolling around D.C., but that seems to be an unlikely possibility, given that both of them all but openly supported violent riots last year.

Let’s see what they do this year … But don’t count on the National Guard becoming activated. Would be borderline miraculous if it were …

Remember Joe Biden’s January 25 Executive Order on transgender reassignment surgery in the military? Well, it looks like that is yet another executive order coming to fruition, particularly given this week’s developments.

First, a brief recollection of some of the first nonsense Biden “passed” through executive orders very shortly after taking office. As mentioned more than once, these executive orders primarily centered on amnesty for illegals, job killing for Americans, and endless rights for transgender individuals.

Of course, via White House spin, all of these executive orders are necessary to be “inclusive,” and such inclusivity should also extend to paying for transgender military service members’ gender reassignment surgery.

“America is stronger, at home and around the world, when it is inclusive. The military is no exception … This means no one will be separated or discharged, or denied reenlistment, solely on the basis of gender identity …

Prospective recruits may serve in their self-identified gender when they have met the appropriate standards for accession into the military services.”
[Source: Newsmax]

Right. Because enemy forces will feel so intimated by the lovey-dovey depiction of the U.S. military to the world. On the contrary, all of them are likely licking their chops now. Who wouldn’t, with such absurd “aims” for the military?

After all, the military serves one major purpose and one major purpose only: Defending the nation against foreign enemies in the best way possible. And that “best way” does not include sunshine, rainbows, and other nonsense of Democrat dreams.

Sadly, however, the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin has agreed with the stance of the White House, sending a rather frightening message around the world (frightening for Americans who actually care about national security).

“The United States armed forces are in the business of defending our fellow citizens from our enemies, foreign and domestic … I believe we accomplish that mission more effectively when we represent all our fellow citizens. I also believe we should avail ourselves of the best possible talent in our population, regardless of gender identity. We would be rendering ourselves less fit to the task if we excluded from our ranks people who meet our standards and who have the skills and the devotion to serve in uniform.” [Source: Department of Defense]

Actually, Mr. Austin, that objective would be “accomplished more effectively” if the best individuals filled the best positions in order to defend the nation, regardless of any other identifying characteristics, from race to gender to every other category the Democrats invent to divide.

By that train of thought, seems like the NFL and NBA would need to be more “inclusive” a well, but it does not appear that much of America is in an uproar over the relatively limited diversity in the professional sports leagues.

In a memo viewed by The Washington Examiner, Austin also directly informed others about his Biden-induced plans for gender reassignment surgery in the military.

“This revised policy will also ensure all medically necessary transition-related care authorized by law is available to all Service members.” [Source: Newsmax]

Well, that’s wonderful. Another marvelous use of taxpayer funds … during a pandemic.

Rep. Jim Banks (R) of Indiana, who is also an Iraq War veteran, also commented on Biden’s increasingly draconian actions, especially when effectively legislating through endless executive orders.

“This is radical and new territory for a presidential administration to force taxpayers to fund sexual reassignment surgeries for those in the military. I’m compassionate toward those individuals who want to undergo an elective surgery of this nature, but taxpayers shouldn’t be on the hook to pay for it. It’s constitutionally dubious that Congress hasn’t passed these measures, but the administration, in a radical way, is pushing through this agenda. I sit on the committee that should debate these issues.” [Source: Newsmax]

It is an issue that frankly shouldn’t be debated at all, but if Biden must insist upon being as divisive as possible, he should at least feign some unity in public.

Oh, that’s right, he virtually never appears in public …

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!