Well, if Biden is to be given credit for anything, it’s for apparently not even bothering the fact that he will issue a flurry of executive orders on his first day of office, which are bound by two commonalities:

1) They undermine all the good Trump has done.
2) They directly threaten national security, civil liberties, or both.

So much for the “unity” that presumably serves as the theme of Biden’s inauguration. More like “Disunity & Division”.

From an international standpoint, Biden is already joyously embracing the destruction of Trump’s America-protecting border and immigration policies, which is rather evident from the 9,000+ strong migrant caravan barreling towards the United States now, just in time for an inauguration focusing on “unity”. Too bad Guatemala seems more determined to block them than the President of the United States.

And, unsurprisingly, the likely Soros-funded Pueblo Sin Fronteras organization (hint:
“sin fronteras” means “without borders”), is already praising the Biden administration.

“We recognize the importance of the incoming Government of the United States having shown a strong commitment to migrants and asylum seekers, which presents an opportunity for the governments of Mexico and Central America to develop policies and a migration management that respect and promote the human rights of the population in mobility,’ said a statement from Pueblo Sin Fronteras, a migrants right group. We will advocate that the Biden government honors its commitments.” [Source: The Daily Wire]

“… that the Biden government honors its commitments.” Wow.

Last time anyone checked, isn’t Biden supposed to honor his commitments to Americans? Or are Americans only relevant when it comes to casting ballots (sooner rather than later, even that may no longer be relevant, given the terrifying success of the 2020 steal).

Imagine Americans storming up to Canada and demanding that ultra-leftist Trudeau honor “commitments” to Americans. Only in leftist land …

Oh, and let’s not forget about Biden’s apparent desire to resume talks with Iran again, specifically the Nuclear Agreement, which might be problematic for the historic peace deals Trump set up throughout the region (not to mention alienate Israel, the United States’ most important ally in the region).

Then again, since Biden apparently intends to amplify the worst elements of the Obama presidency, it would be no surprise at all if a series of wars, rather than peace agreements, ensues.

However, Biden has also ensured that he’s paying equal attention to how to upend the domestic front, starting with his promise to destroy jobs on his first day in office (during a pandemic the Democrats constantly harp about, mind you). In rather sickening virtue signaling to the ultra-leftists, Biden proudly proclaimed he would be cancelling the Keystone Pipeline on his first day in office, already demonstrating a clear bent in favor of the leftist.

And, as further evidence of his leftist-pleasing agenda, Bernie Sanders was one of the first to slavishly adore Biden’s decision (assuming Biden himself even made the decision, or if a mysterious handler did, perhaps one of his many big tech advisors).

“The Keystone Pipeline is & always has been a disaster. I’m delighted that Joe Biden will cancel the Keystone permit on his first day in office. With all of the major crises facing America, we must never lose sight of the most existential threat facing our planet: climate change.” [Source: Breitbart]

Well, of course Sanders would consider the Keystone Pipeline project to be “a disaster”. After all, any project that encourages gainful employment over government dependence by Sanders’ “standards” would be a disaster, as it would upset his fervent dreams of the Communist State of America.

The singular use of “state” is deliberate, given how gung ho the left is to destroy the electoral college, as well as any semblance of state autonomy. The disrespect for state autonomy is even clearer when considering yet another executive order that Biden is mulling over, and, surprise, surprise, this executive order pertains to masks.

“Our legal team thinks I can do that based upon the degree to which there’s a crisis in those states, and how bad things are for the country, and if we don’t do it, what happens … The question is whether I have the legal authority as president to sign an executive order. We think we do.” [Source: ABC News]

Great, Biden. Does your “legal team” consider the supposed autonomy that individual states have to govern their citizens as well? Since masks have not been formalized into federal law, wouldn’t arbitrarily commanding states’ governors to tell their citizens what to wear (or not to wear) just might start teetering on the edge of authoritarianism?

Frighteningly, insufficient space exists to fully detail all Biden’s highly likely decisions he will take on his first day in office, but, very unfortunately, those executive orders are likely to be the first of many.

Perhaps most disturbing observation of all is taken directly from Biden’s website, which makes it rather obvious that he will not only pursue the same America-destroying path as Obama, but that he will also do so on a much grander scale as needed.

“On day one, Biden will sign a series of new executive orders with unprecedented reach that go well beyond the Obama‐​Biden Administration platform and put us on the right track.” [Source: The CATO Institute]


So, in other words, Americans can expect an Obama on steroids, or, more accurately, a direct attack on civil liberties, a deliberate division between various groups of people, and, of course, a devious international effort to enrich a select few while placing the rest of the nation in serious jeopardy (cough, China-colluding Hunter, cough).

One can only hope that the leftists face a reckoning in 2022 … if free, transparent elections can still function under their “leadership”, that is.

Since Democrats are so intent on an even more ridiculous impeachment scam than the first (which is quite the “achievement”, given how baseless Impeachment 1.0 was), it looks like they just might learn the consequences of impeaching on a whim the hard way.

Especially when the GOP can initiate impeachment proceedings against the Democrats themselves, and, unlike Impeachment 1.0 and Impeachment 2.0 regarding Trump, the GOP actually has a little thing called evidence for their potential impeachment Biden, which will commence shortly after the sham (or shame?) of the Harris-Biden inauguration.

That is correct: GOP Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has already openly opposed Liz Cheney’s absurd siding with the leftists, has announced her intention to lead an impeachment effort against Biden immediately after his inauguration, citing his rather questionable relationships with China and Ukraine as top reasons for the impeachment.

“We have to make sure that our leaders are held accountable, we cannot have a president of the United States that is willing to abuse the power of the office of the presidency and be easily bought off by foreign governments … Chinese energy companies, Ukrainian energy companies ….

So on January 21, I will be filing articles of impeachment on Joe Biden.” [Source: Breitbart]

Greene has much more of a point than the Democrats do, especially since Hunter Biden couldn’t be bothered to pick up a laptop loaded with all kinds of incriminating evidence, so incriminating that even intelligence agencies had to admit that none of it was Russian disinformation (no matter how many reporters Biden calls a “one horse pony” over this issue, it will not change the fact that all the material begins and ends with his illustrious offspring).

After all, if the Democrats are so concerned about “imminent violence” incited by Trump, then they should be really concerned about imminent invasions of other nations, particularly since the reigning ideology that governs China, authoritarian communism, is already being played out across various leftist states now. Though all the authoritarian tactics in California, New York, and others are due to “protecting public health”, of course.

Authoritarians always have an ethical-sounding excuse for egregious violations of civil liberties.

And, since the Democrats are so intent on starting Biden’s presidency with an impeachment trial, Biden himself may as well join in the fun. After all, he didn’t have to answer a single question regarding Hunter’s activities anyway, courtesy of big tech deliberately suffocating them all.

Meanwhile, other high-profile Republicans who have not gone completely Darth Vader on the party (cough, Cheney, cough) continue to highlight the complete senselessness of the impeachment proceedings now, including Lindsey Graham, who questioned why Obama wasn’t impeached by the same “logic” used by Democrats now.

“We’ll play this out … We impeach the president today without any evidence. It’s just sheer hatred. If this becomes the norm, be careful what you wish for today. Under this theory, the radical left — if you can impeach a president after they’re out of office, why don’t we impeach George Washington? He owned slaves. Where does this stop? So, to my Republican colleagues, let’s stand firm for the idea — whether you like Donald Trump or not, he’s not above the law…

Should we impeach Barack Obama because, for 24 hours, he never lifted a finger to help those people under siege in Benghazi? Where does this stop?” [Source: Breitbart]

Exactly, Mr. Graham. Trump is not above the law, no matter how much the fake news media tries to pain him out as such.

On the contrary, other characters in the Democrat Party, notably Biden Sr. and his son Hunter, well trained under the tutelage of Obama, appear to be well above the law. Which is precisely why Greene’s proposed impeachment is infinitely more logical than any action taken against Trump.

In addition, Greene’s proposed plan might make Mr. Schumer rethink his glee about attempting to punish Trump after he has left office. In a recent statement, Mr. Schumer clearly gloated about the fact that Trump may face trial even after leaving the White House, even if the trial does not begin in the final days of his presidency.

“A Senate trial can begin immediately, with agreement from the current Senate Majority Leader to reconvene the Senate for an emergency session, or it will begin after January 19th. But make no mistake, there will be an impeachment trial in the United States Senate.” [Source: Fox News]

Interesting commentary, Mr. Schumer.

And, to use your forceful wording, “make no mistake”, there will be a reckoning for traitors against the nation, especially those who empower foreign enemies at the expense of not only American security, but also the precious freedoms that make the United States the most exceptional nation in the world.

Well, Ms. Pelosi predictably followed through on her threats after Mike Pence refused to invoke the 25th Amendment against President Trump.

In fact, she followed through so quickly that one might wonder why she hasn’t dedicated similar passion towards cleaning up her cesspool of a city and bringing Americans much-needed relief. But, then all one has to do is remember that Pelosi is the personification of the swamp, which would explain why she has limited dedication to representing the American people.

And this limited dedication is now on full display with the House aggressively pursuing impeachment against Trump for a second time, as it threatened to do if Pence did not invoke the 25th Amendment.

Needless to say, Impeachment 2.0 has to rank near the top of the most virulent symptoms of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), which has swept across the fake news media and its globalist puppet master ever since Americans took back control of their government in 2016.

In fact, the TDS is so bad that the impeachment will not even be fast-tracked, per Mitch McConnell, who is widely rumored to be supportive of impeachment proceedings. Drawn out impeachment proceedings, at that.

McConnell already voted to not fast track impeachment, which means that Biden’s first months of “leadership” will be marred by an Impeachment 2.0 scam.

And his inauguration theme is “unity.”

Apparently, some other extreme leftists aren’t satisfied with Impeachment 2.0, they apparently want Trump remembered in the same way that the most sadistic terrorists on the planet are.

Democrat “Representative” Eric Swalwell, who primarily excels at representing the illustrious communism of California (and sleeping with Chinese spies), presented a rather dramatic analogy that illuminates the degree to which TDS can afflict the left.

“Well, Osama bin Laden did not enter U.S. soil on September 11, but it was widely acknowledged he was responsible for inspiring the attack on our country. The president, with his words, using the words ‘Fight,’ with the speakers that he assembled that day, who called for ‘trial by combat’ and said we have to ‘take names and kick ass,’ that is hate speech that inspired and radicalized people to storm the Capitol …

When you read the indictments from the U.S. Attorney’s office of people who have been arrested, in their FBI interviews, they cite that they were called there by the president. They were there in the Capitol because the president told them to do so. We must hold the president accountable for his inciting words.” [Source: Breitbart]

Needless to say, Swalwell’s claims are beyond hyperbolic, as well as downright dangerous. Especially since bin Laden was taken out by Navy Seals, and more than one on the left has openly advocated for Trump’s (and his supporters’) deaths.

Exhibit A: “Comedian” David Cross, who apparently finds unity offensive, given that his response to unity was as follows:

“F— that. I want blood.” [Source: The Washington Examiner]

How eloquent. Democrat-led education “wins” again in terms of just how simpleminded it can make its leftist lemmings.

On top of the fact that Swalwell’s claims fall even flatter given all the violence advocated by the left, in particular sadistic violence against law enforcement officers and anyone remotely associated with law and order, Trump’s own commentaries underscore the total falsehoods being perpetuated by Swalwell and the rest of the left.

“In light of reports of more demonstrations, I urge that there must be no violence, no lawbreaking and no vandalism of any kind. That is not what I stand for …

I call on all Americans to help ease tensions and calm tempers. Thank You.” [Source: News Max]

In addition, Trump also delivered a speech from the Oval Office, where he reaffirmed the real mission of MAGA and the real values that Patriots should abide by.

“‘Making America Great Again’ has always been about defending the rule of law … Supporting the men and women of law enforcement, and upholding our nation’s most sacred traditions and values …

Mob violence goes against everything believe in and everything our movement stands for. No true supporter of mine could ever endorse political violence. No true supporter of mine could ever disrespect law enforcement or our great American flag. No true supporter of mine could ever harass their fellow Americans. If you do any of these things, you are not supporting our movement, you are attacking it and you are attacking our country. We cannot tolerate it.” [Source: News Max]

So, Swalwell and Cheney, where is this “violence” that Trump is actively inciting? Seems he’s saying (and, more importantly, doing) the exact opposite, from supporting law enforcement at home to brokering peace deals in the Middle East.

No matter what the fake news says, they will never be able to undo what Trump does, which is continuously fight for the United States, both domestically and abroad.

History will not look kindly upon traitors like Ms. Cheney, who openly advocated for bloody wars in the Middle East, but it will look kindly upon patriots like Trump, who brokered peace deals that would have been considered unprecedented just a few years ago (again, due to Obama’s own bloody wars in the Middle East, which have been called out by various organizations, including Human Rights Watch).

And, just when everything seems incredibly gloomy, a recent poll reveals that two-thirds of Republican voters are prepared to back Trump in 2024.

While questionable Mitch McConnell might support the rather absurd Impeachment 2.0 (and Rep. Cheney fully supportive of the impeachment of Trump), Mike Pence just took a defiant stand against Nancy Pelosi in her rather zealous efforts to impeach a sitting president with barely a week left in office.

And, Pelosi being Pelosi, she has aimed for a two-prong attack on Trump: First, she has demanded for Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment; second, she has threatened impeachment if Pence does not invoke the 25th Amendment.

On top of that, Pelosi already drew up articles of impeachment while awaiting Pence’s response. Apparently, Pelosi deigns to work when it’s a work of destruction, which is quite clear from her rather dramatic letter demanding Trump’s imminent impeachment.

“In his conduct while President of the United States — and in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States, and to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, Donald John Trump engaged in high Crimes and Misdemeanors by inciting violence against the Government of the United States.” [Source: Fox News]

Hm. Ok. So, Trump’s tweets clearly called for peace; his speeches clearly called for peace; and virtually any other form of communication from the President has always urged peace. Would Ms. Pelosi kindly point to the exact words Trump used to incite violence?

As literally no one in the fake news media, or the entirety of the swamp for that matter, is able to do so. And that’s because Trump never incited violence.

“Thus incited by President Trump, members of the crowd he had addressed, in an attempt to, among other objectives, interfere with the Joint Session’s solemn constitutional duty to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election, unlawfully breached and vandalized the Capitol, injured and killed law enforcement personnel, menaced Members of Congress, the Vice President and Congressional personnel, and engaged in other violent, deadly, destructive, and seditious acts.” [Source: Fox News]

Now hold on just a second, Ms. Pelosi. You seriously have the gall to mention “killed law enforcement personnel” in this letter? Were you asleep for the entirety of 2020? As in asleep through the nightly riots that openly called for the death of law enforcement officers, and, in more than one tragic case, resulted in the death, disability, or otherwise egregious harm to law enforcement officers?

So, no words whatsoever to curtail serious violence that killed hundreds upon hundreds of people for months, but all of the sudden Ms. Pelosi is concerned about law enforcement. When the law enforcement is presumably guarding her undeserved office, that is.

Pelosi was also sure to conclude her letter on an equally dramatic note, using Trump’s full name yet again for some kind of emphasis, though to sane minds she is really only emphasizing her full blown Trump Derangement Syndrome.

“Donald John Trump thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.” [Source: Fox News]

Pence, in the meantime, does not appear overly impressed by Pelosi’s dual impeachment and 25th Amendment bid, which he made blatantly clear in a rather pointed letter to Pelosi, which clearly indicates just how absurd her requests truly are.

“But now, with just eight days left in the President’s term, you and the Democratic Caucus are demanding that the Cabinet and I invoke the 25th Amendment. I do not believe that such course of action is in the best interest of our nation or consistent with our Constitution.” [Source: Breitbart]

Gotta love that “eight days left” comment, which blatantly calls out her rather misguided efforts.
On top of that, really gotta love the emphasis on “best interest,” as Pence is absolutely correct. Impeachment 2.0 is certainly not in the best interest of the nation, just as Impeachment 1.0 was not. In fact, impeachment is so divisive that it is rarely used, but it is quite clear that the Democrats really thrive on division, no matter how often they baselessly drone on about their “unity.”

Pence further amplifies his craft by turning Pelosi’s own words against her in the most brilliant, effective way possible.

“Last week I did not yield to pressure to exert power beyond my constitutional authority to determine the outcome of the election, and I will not now yield to efforts in the House of Representatives to play political games at a time so serious in the life of our Nation.” [Source: Breitbart]

Exactly. And rather difficult for Pelosi to respond cogently. Then again, she has the apparently permanent blanket of protection from fake news media, which means that Pence’s letter will probably barely circulate in the mainstream. A great misfortune.

That said, the spirit of Pence’s final statement encapsulates the hatred of the left and loyalty of his service to Americans.

“I urge you and every member of Congress to avoid actions that would further divide and inflame the passions of the moment.” [Source: Breitbart]

Absolutely. The left is absolutely aware of the havoc that Impeachment 2.0 will cause, just as they are absolutely aware of what BLM and Antifa are truly capable of, which Americans were subjected to throughout all of 2020, and now apparently 2021, particularly with Antifa’s latest stunt in New York City.

Looks like Democrats are intent on starting 2021 with a rather unoriginal bang.

As another new week in 2021 started, Americans were assaulted again with another attack on civil liberties and free speech, which occurred after Amazon, Google, and Apple openly colluded to ban Parler, a social media platform that does not silence conservatives.

And that ban occurred shortly after social media giants, including Twitter, indefinitely banned President Trump, despite the fact that neither social media platform has felt particularly compelled to ban the social media accounts of globally recognized authoritarian dictators across Asia, the Middle East, and other regions.

Needless to say, legions of high-profile conservatives and their reporters have felt increasingly unwelcome on openly leftist, communism-supporting social media platforms, which is why several individuals naturally fled to Parler, where they know they won’t be put into “Facebook Jail” for 30 days for daring to say #MAGA or any other offensive word or phrase (and, predictably, the list of offensive words and phrases will never stop growing in leftist land).

However, like the true authoritarians that they are, big tech decided that they were not content with controlling speech on their platforms, despite the rather egregious violations of First Amendment protections in doing so. Instead, they decided to use their might to crush any other outlets that are not as eager to ban conservatives as they are.

Which would be Parler, which has just filed suit against Amazon.

However, despite the unprecedented, coordinated, and completely unlawful collusion that big tech orchestrated against Parler, several individuals support the resurrection of the social media alternative, including prominent investor and Fox News contributor Dan Bongino, who vowed bankruptcy before allowing Parler to be crushed by authoritarian big tech.

“Parler will be back, just so the audience understands. I will go bankrupt and destitute before I let this happen … It’s not about the money. It’s not about anything. If Parler goes down, everyone else will be next.” [Source: Fox News]


Parler is hardly the first target of these tech behemoths; it is merely one of the higher profile targets. However, like all authoritarians, big tech will never be satisfied until all of its opposition is crushed.

In addition, Bongino highlights the overt hypocrisy in the big tech industry, including the rather rich subsidiaries the biggest companies enjoy from the government, courtesy of Section 230.

“It’s a free-market? Because Twitter and Facebook are subsidized by the United States government’s law Section 230 where they are allowed to pull down and leave up whatever they want and they are immune to lawsuits due to 230. But, when Parler, which is not a surveillance platform, abides by the very same text of the law 230, Parler is wiped from the face of the Earth and doesn’t get the government subsidy? So to all you geniuses out there: Please explain to me again how this is a free-market argument when a potentially trillion-dollar subsidy is given to favorite enterprises but not to Parler, who actually follows the law.” [Source: Fox News]

Another salient point, and another point that the fake news media will surely ignore in favor of their glee over Trump’s permanent ban from social media, despite the clear and present danger that ban completely poses to an increasingly fragile republic.

While Biden absurdly claims that his inauguration will focus on “unity”, it is a bit difficult to unite the nation when he is completely subservient to the psychotic aims of the Democrat Party, which has steadily chipped away at people’s civil liberties and constitutional freedoms over the past several years.

And now, with the leftists’ illegitimate control of the legislative and executive branches, they’ve become more emboldened than ever in silencing their opposition, to the extent that even the ACLU, along with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and several other European leaders, have openly criticized big tech companies for their increasingly authoritarian actions, including the indefinite ban of President Trump (meanwhile, the Iranian government is free to use Twitter to its heart’s content).

Glenn Greenwald, a liberal journalist who quit, and subsequently skewered, The Intercept for its refusal to publish an article on Joe Biden, recently shredded big tech for its completely open assault on conservatives now.

“Tech monopolies — FB, Google, Apple, Amazon — have more concentrated wealth & power than any in history. They have used brute force 3 times in 3 months to manipulate US politics: censoring NY Post, banning Trump, destroying Parler. And liberals are overwhelmingly supportive …

That these Silicon Valley monopolies are grace menaces to political freedom & economic well-being is *not* a right-wing view … Authoritarians never believe they’re authoritarians, no matter how much censorship, surveillance, jingoism, & imprisonment they demand.” [Source: Fox News]

Again, Greenwald is absolutely on point, and he raises very serious questions that the fake news media will also ignore. On the contrary, the fake news media will keep chomping away for even more restrictions on Americans and their civil liberties, all while suffocating any form of speech or thought that they would never deign to agree with.

One can only hope that big tech will eventually be weakened, but it appears highly unlikely that the Democrats will do anything whatsoever to rein in the power of big tech.

Furthermore, the Democrats may also be willing to do just about anything to empower big tech, provided the companies willingly crush any and all opposition, as they’ve done in earnest for the past several months now.

If you think big tech behaved badly during the election, then it just behaved really badly over the weekend.

The suffocation of conservatives coupled with the protection of the Bidens, BLM, and any other leftist cause during 2020 was already reprehensible, but the recent actions taken against rival social media platform, Parler, over the weekend, defy democracy in newly draconian ways.

Even worse, it is no longer just Twitter and Facebook that have joined the fray against conservatives; both Apple and Amazon got in on the action this weekend.

At the time of this writing, Amazon and Apple have both de-platformed Parler, which means that the social media app cannot be downloaded, nor can the conservative lawmakers and other representatives on Parler communicate with their constituents.

In other words, de-platforming Parler went a few outrageous steps beyond the already outrageous censorship dominating big tech platforms in 2020; in 2021, big tech companies have moved from extreme censorship to just straight up shutdowns for platforms that dare to disagree with the leftist mantra.

Quite clearly, big tech is feeling more emboldened. than ever with Biden’s “leadership” on hand. If leadership were simply another commodity that can be bought and sold in the festering swamp, that is. Which is rather obvious from Biden’s transition team alone, since at least nine members on the team formerly worked for Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

The actions against Parler have drawn uproar over the weekend, with GOP Senator Devin Nunes shredding big tech companies over the weekend for the imminent threat that they pose to democracy.

“Legislatively, you have to understand, this is not about Big Tech and that they’re just in Silicon Valley and they’re just trying to make money, no they’re working for the Democratic socialist party … They’re being cheered on by this. They are state-run media and really it’s the communication system …

That’s how people are receiving their information is through this funnel of very few companies that are being controlled by the Democrat socialist party.” [Source: Fox News]

Humorously, none of the big tech companies had any comment for whether or not they were under the control of the Democrat Socialist Party. Apparently not even a comment that distinguishes Democrats from Socialists, as that distinction has clearly been abolished. The only question is why they aren’t being called the Democrat Communist Party instead.

Nunes also indicated that big tech companies were grossly violating the First Amendment, which is precisely why he has consulted with various colleagues about actions they can potentially take against Silicon Valley.

Currently, Nunes cannot communicate with 3 million followers on Parler, so his free speech was summarily cut off by leftists’ whims. Just as free speech tends to be cut off in virtually all authoritarian regimes, today and throughout history.

“I’ve been talking to many of my colleagues, Republicans on the House side and a couple senators,” he continued. “We’re going to look for legal options, do we have any legal options? Do we have our First Amendment rights? Are they being violated? …

I don’t know where the hell the Department of Justice is at right now or the FBI.” [Source: Fox News]

Well, the FBI was probably busy burying Hunter Biden’s laptop or pursuing Russian bogeyman. And the FBI’s activities, of course, are also being buried by the fake news media and big tech giants, so … full circle, in a rather dreary, foreboding way.

As far as constitutional rights are concerned, needless to say, big tech’s unilateral decision to oppose Parler not only grossly violates the First Amendment, but it also is a rather flagrant case of collusion, or when firms work together illegally to crush competition and maintain market dominance.

Which is precisely why Nunes advocates for a RICO case to be brought against big tech, given the clear collusion taking place between them.

For reference, the term “collusion” is commonly used in conjunction with cartels, the mafia, and other similarly themed organized crime groups. Ironically, RICO was first used when taking down the American Mafia, which had terrorized New York City and others for decades. So it would be fitting for collusion charges to be filed against big tech companies and their outlaw Democrat demigods.

And, hilariously, as it turns out, some of the biggest donors to Biden’s inauguration day include, you got it: big tech companies. Including Google and Microsoft.

So much for the “unity” that Biden promises for the nation. Based upon how brazen big tech is becoming, it doesn’t seem like unity is the first thing on their mind either …

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!