Another day, another episode of liberal hate. In fact, the latest leftists ideas for “public school” actually make one long for Psaki’s “bold and ambitious” one day per week school reopening plan. Unfortunately, it turns out that Psaki actually was called out for “miscommunication” from Biden himself.

To be fair, BLM is not exactly the most coherent entity in the world, so Biden may as well own up to the fact he didn’t fully understand what “they” wanted in terms of public schools reopening.

And, just in case that statement seems too extreme, consider the commentary from the leftist school districts themselves. Apparently, even though students have had limited, if any, access to math, reading, writing, and pretty much every other vital skill or knowledge (forget history, the most offensive subject of all these days)., the Democrats apparently think these skills are worthless relative to the demands of the horrifically empowered BLM.

In other words, rather than bother with tedious skills involved in the arts and mathematics, Democrats have apparently decided that a good way for the students to finally return to school is to have their hatred of whites re-instilled even more deeply, for reasons unknown to anyone who isn’t full of hatred.

Needless to say, this “curriculum” flies in the face of the “unity” promised by Biden, though by now it is fairly clear what Biden really meant about “unity.” Just consider the below:

“Often unconsciously, white elites work to perpetuate racism through politics, law, education, and the media.” [Source: The Blaze]

Could have fooled most American Patriots, given that it appears BLM is “working to perpetuate racism” in all facets of life.

Oh, and America has apparently been “built on racism” (guess AP American history is next on the cancellation chopping block).

Needless to say, per a teacher who spoke in terrified anonymity, the new and unimproved “teacher training” involves “scoldings, guilt-trips, and demands to demean oneself simply to make another feel ’empowered.”

And at which grade level is all the hate supposed to start? Kindergarten, apparently …

It is abundantly clear that the only “unity” the left will ever promote is the united hatred against whites and apparently all values associated with “whiteness,” including hard work and family.

By the way, doesn’t the left realize that by insisting upon basic ethics as “white values,” they are automatically being “racist” towards minorities, as stating that these types of beliefs are “white” suggests that minorities don’t care about families or hard work.

No wonder so many hardworking minorities are flooding to the GOP. Unfortunately, now that the Democrats are totally drunk on their own power, it is unclear if the mass migration of hardworking, family-oriented minorities to the GOP will bring about real change by this point.

After all, millions more ballots can be manufactured, though at this point, especially with the increased calls to terminate Fox News, Newsmax, and many more, Democrats may not even need to mess with ballots anymore if they can simply control all the news networks, a la China style.

They essentially control all the networks now anyway, especially through social media, but they won’t be happy until they’re the equivalent of the CCP. Complete with Beijing Joe and his son in tow.

Please, Trump, return. Please. America needs you.

Trump plans to return with a bang, which is quite clear from his highly anticipated, ongoing commentary associated with the CPAC.

Even better, the CPAC will be taking place in Trump’s home state: Florida. The Governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, has attracted the ire of fake news media for daring to have reasonable COVID restrictions and vastly more freedom than the likes of California and New York.

Ironically, California and New York have more COVID cases, and Nevada is also rather lockdown happy. Which is why the American Conservative Union President, Matt Schlapp, made the “very intentional decision to go to Florida.”

“We considered other states, Tennessee, Georgia Florida, Texas … Florida just seems like the obvious place … You know, the city of Orlando obviously has got the infrastructure to take a big conference. I mean, Las Vegas would have too, but … the governor there just makes it impossible, is basically making it impossible for any business to be open, whereas the governor of Florida is doing just the opposite.” [Source: Fox News]

Which, conveniently for Trump, means that he can not only enjoy the greatest presence at the CPAC, but also do so within his beloved home state.

And Trump’s presence is extremely clear given that any potential GOP hopeful would be advised to align with Trump, or align with the high unlikelihood of being elected. Which Schlapp also made clear.

“I think all the ones that are seriously considering running — and obviously Donald Trump is the big [one], is looming over all those decisions the most … And look, you’re not going to get the Republican nomination being a never-Trumper. You’re not going to get the Republican nomination if you’re not a strong conservative. So all of that kind of courting, it’s appropriate that it starts at CPAC.” [Source: Fox News]

The CPAC Conference is critical for the GOP to get back on track, especially since they have finally come around to the fact that Trump has left an indelible impact on the party. GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida made the stakes beyond clear to the audience.

“We are in a battle for the soul of the Republican party and I intend to win it … You can help me. You can help me break a corrupt system. You can send a representative who actually represents you and you can send Liz Cheney home — back home to Washington, D.C.” [Source: Fox News]

A battle for the soul indeed. Which cannot come soon enough, giving the ongoing leftist onslaught on liberties, not to mention the most basic tenets of national security.

Fortunately, with Trump on board, logic and sanity are guaranteed, starting with the very no-nonsense policies that got Trump elected in the first place.

“We’re going to go through the real stuff. Not the imagined charges, not the fantastical charges. Just the real stuff … All of the globalists tell us that we should be going along with the globe. Well, the globe tells us this is the wrong way to vote. You vote in person. That’s what you do in these other democracies. You vote once and there’s a lot of security around it. So much security that the American government often helps pay for that security.” [Source: Fox News]

The “real stuff” cannot come soon enough. In particular security.

Rep. Elise Stefanik is rapidly becoming a superstar in the GOP, for darn good reason too. After all, she has not only wisely sided with Trump, but she has openly called out corruption as she sees it, including not only domestic affairs, but also international affairs.

Particularly in terms of national security, which is precisely why Stefanik has proposed a new bill that will address the ongoing corruption of ultra-woke universities and their rather blatant, lucrative connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Curiously, universities also seem to be the source of many of the BLM and Antifa “ideas,” especially since college campuses are overrun with brats who set fires and destroy buildings in order to “cancel” anyone remotely conservative from coming to campus and speaking.

What were once supposedly centers of learning and discovery have become little more than massive Marxist indoctrination centers, which also come with a massive helping hand from the CCP.

Which is precisely why Stefanik introduced the “End College Chinese and Communist Party (CCP) Act.”

“House Democrats may have blocked my amendment last week, but their dangerous partisan obstruction will not stop me from standing up for America and strongly against China … I’m proud to introduce the End College Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Act to halt taxpayer dollars from flowing through American education institutions to benefit the CCP once and for all.” [Source: Fox News]

What an absolutely fantastic idea! With the absence of federal funding, numerous overpaid professors and administrators who largely contribute nothing to society very well may find themselves out of a job. And forced to deal with the real world … or become “experts” in the Biden administration.

Thus, the “End College Chinese Communist Partnerships Act” would finally block federal funding to universities that insist upon continuous collaboration with one of the United States’ deadliest foes, with collaboration defined as follows:

“A contractual partnership in effect with an entity that is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Government of the People’s Republic of China, or organized under the laws of the People’s Republic of China.” [Source: Fox News]

It is quite a sad day in America when such a bill has to be proposed. Rewind a few decades ago and imagine representatives being forced to propose bills that limit Soviet infiltration in American universities. How far the swamp has fallen …

And, Stefanik’s claims are, as usual, based on evidence, particularly when she details the Confucius institutes, which have frighteningly been in existence for over 15 years in the United States.

Let’s not forget the lovely Confucius Institutes on ultra-woke college campuses, which began in 2004 at the University of Maryland and have expanded like wildfire ever since.

“The CCP and its diplomats, through Confucius Institutes, have monitored students on American campuses and has forced its views upon our institutions of higher learning … [through] propaganda efforts in academia … [the CCP] has censored discussion on Tibet and Taiwan and has repeatedly interfered in campus-wide events.” [Source: Fox News]

Well, that would certainly explain the “free speech zones” peppering college campuses today, not to mention the rather closed-minded, brainwashed views that students are endowed with, none of which exactly make them employable, thereby driving them to the streets as professional protestors.

Brilliant, really. For the CCP, that is.

Unfortunately, short-sighted university greed will come at grave detriment to the American population. Especially given its ultimate subservience to the “soft power” that China is notorious for.

“Through Confucius Institutes, the Chinese government is attempting to change the impression in the United States and around the world that China is an economic and security threat … Confucius Institutes’ soft power encourages complacency towards China’s pervasive, long-term initiatives against both government critics at home and businesses and academic institutions abroad.” [Source: Fox News]

Exactly. China is playing the long game, the Biden administration is playing … something totally different, though more than one would suggest that the administration is really just becoming little more than a willing arm of the CCP.

So much for “unity.”

Well, well, well. If there is one thing that Mitt Romney can be counted on, it would be looking out for himself. Which, in his case, means talking nonstop to the media … about Trump. In fact, Romney talks about Trump so often that one wonders exactly what Romney did before as a politician.

Whatever it was, he will most likely be known as one of the most anti-Trump RINOs in Washington, followed closely by McConnell and a few others, namely those who voted to impeachment Trump in the most absurd impeachment trial ever … at least since 2019, anyway.

That said, Romney has now apparently decided to stir the pot by running his mouth about Trump and 2024, and it is safe to say that his commentary would make most reasonable people suspicious.

According to Romney, Trump remains immensely popular, to the extent that his name has soared to the top of the list of all potential presidential contenders for 2024. On top of that, Romney stated that he would expect Trump to win “in a landslide.”

“I look at the polls, and the polls show that among the names being floated as potential contenders in 2024, if you put President Trump in there among Republicans, he wins in a landslide.” [Source: Washington Times]

Well, perhaps Romney should spend more time ruminating upon why Trump remains so possible, rather than ranting away in such a manner that a person unfamiliar with individual American politicians would assume he is just another rather vocal Democrat.

Speaking of being vocal, Romney also weighed in on Trump’s voice, which he asserts is “the loudest voice.”

“He has by far the largest voice and a big impact in my party … I don’t know if he’s planning to run in 2024 or not, but if he does, I’m pretty sure he would win the nomination.” [Source: News Max]

Interesting use of the phrase “my party,” in particular the word “my.” Despite being one syllable and two letters long, it carries significant connotations. Romney clearly does not consider Trump part of “his” party, in spite of the fact that Trump served as a Republican President from 2016-2020.

In fact, maybe by “my party,” Romney may have been secretly alluding to some other party, namely the Democrats, considering his own “influence” has been far better for leftists than conservatives.

Despite his “predictions,” which do not exactly require a magician’s talents, Romney also asserted that he would “not” be voting for Trump in 2024.

“I would not be voting for President Trump again. I haven’t voted for him in the past,” he said. “I would probably be getting behind somebody who I thought more represented the tiny wing of the Republican Party that I represent.”
[Source: Washington Times]

Well, thanks for sharing the most non-mysterious piece of news ever, Romney. As if any other outcome would be possible. After all, voting to impeach Trump not once, but twice, makes it rather clear you “won’t” be voting for him.

One also wonders why Romney “won’t” switch to the Democrat Party, but apparently he enjoys generating more headlines as a rebel Republican, despite the immense, ongoing damage being caused to the United States.

Fortunately, Lindsey Graham, who is infinitely more reasonable than Romney, asserted the need for Trump not only in 2024, but also in 2022.

“I want us to come together as much as possible. I think we need to be united around getting the majority back. … The worst possible outcome for the Republican Party is to continue to argue amongst itself.” [Source: The Hill]

Absolutely correct, Mr. Graham.

Unfortunately, the Republicans have already been arguing amongst themselves, with the apex of this argument on full display with 7 GOP Senators voting to impeach Trump. Nonetheless, it is quite clear that Trump’s influence will never leave again, nor should it.

After all, he’s one of the few public servants Americans have left …

He can try all he wants, by Cuomo is unlikely to wiggle out of the latest mess that he made for himself. Unfortunately, this particular mess involves the deaths of thousands of innocent people, courtesy of Cuomo sending thousands into nursing homes with scant protection against COVID.

In fact, Cuomo is so blatantly in the wrong that even other Democrats are fleeing him. A classic case of the left eating its own, but it’s certainly a case welcome by more than one American Patriot.

Just consider Ron Kim’s commentary on Twitter, bearing in mind that Kim, like many other state and local representatives, have dealt with significant abuse from Cuomo, based upon several widely disseminated reports.

However, this time Kim took care of him.

“Cuomo abused his powers to hide life and death information from the Department of Justice that prevented lawmakers from legislating – like fully repealing corporate immunity for nursing homes. That is an impeachable offense …

The only way to protect the integrity of the co-equal branch of the state government, AKA the ‘People’s House,’ is to start impeachment.” [Source: Fox News]

Fantastic. Given how vicious Cuomo has been to Trump from the very beginning, not to mention his open support of President Trump, it would be highly ironic if Cuomo were to be impeached instead. Some may even refer to that as poetic justice.

De Blasio, routinely known for being one of the most leftist, incompetent mayors in recent times, as even weighed in on Cuomo, which is a bit startling in light of the state of New York City now. Nonetheless, his criticism of Cuomo is welcome, if only to illuminate Democrat incompetence.

“I have not spoken to [Cuomo]. No, I do not accept his explanation … There needs to be a full investigation … we need to get the whole truth and make sure nothing like this ever happens ever again.” [Source: Fox News]

“The whole truth.” What a concept. What Trump tried to do with the election results, in other words, though apparently back then Democrats did not believe in “the whole truth.”

Thus, some of the criticisms are a bit ironic, such as those of Emilia Decaudin, the Queens County Democratic District Leader from the 37th Assembly District.

“Actions have consequences. I consider it my responsibility as a representative of the Democrats in my community to hold members of our party accountable, from City Council up to the Governor … The continued wrong doing of Governor Andrew M. Cuomo must be repudiated, or else we are no better than the Republicans who fail to hold their own leaders accountable, out of fear and self-preservation.” [Source: Breitbart]

Indeed actions do have consequences. It will be wonderful when people are one day treated equally under the justice system, not to mention the fake news media.

Other Democrats just could not resist getting political, such as Patrick Nelson, a State Committee Member from the 113th Assembly District.

“Honesty, dignity, respect and the wellbeing of our state and country must always come before party allegiance. When a member of the Democratic Party does wrong, we seek to ensure that they are held accountable no matter how powerful they are, unlike in the Republican Party.” [Source: Breitbart]

Nice words, Nelson. What would be even nicer is if the Democrats actually followed through on that. And as far as “we seek to ensure that they are held accountable,” could the likes of Clinton please be explained from that perspective? Not to mention Pelosi?

What’s the most deplorable of all is the fact that Psaki and Biden lapped up Cuomo like crazy, going so far as to publicly comment that Cuomo is the “gold star” in terms of handing COVID. Clearly, that “gold star” is one of the worst attempts at a mirage, though not many expected the mirage to shatter just as spectacularly as it did.

Cuomo goes from the media’s golden boy to what he really is: Someone who was willing to openly lie about nursing home fatalities. Then, on top of that, Cuomo also found it fitting to publicly blame the nurses and others for COVID transmissions, rather than eyeballing his own deadly policies.

That said, an impeachment effort against Cuomo just might be in the news within a few weeks, particularly when taking into account the State AG’s findings regarding Cuomo and the COVID situation.

And wouldn’t it be ironic if Cuomo is impeached, after Trump escaped impeachment … twice. Poetic justice strikes again!

Clarence Thomas, undoubtedly one of the most respected judges who sits on the Supreme Court of the United States, has expressed his dismay with the way in which the Court ultimately ruled over various states questionable election procedures.

In fact, he even muses that the Court seemed to delay endlessly, particularly when the election itself was rapidly approached. As revealed by Thomas, the dispute was not settled before the election, which meant governors’ asinine mail-in ballots were used exactly as they intended.

Which leads Thomas to wonder.

“One wonders what the Court waits for … We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent.” [Source: The Daily Wire]

So, in other words, not only was there no resolution before the election, there remains limited room even now for providing “clear rules for future elections.”

Thomas also made it clear that by “doing nothing” all that will result is the further erosion of voter confidence, thought it it safe to say that voter confidence has not exactly been improving since the fiasco of 2020.

“We are fortunate that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision to change the receipt deadline for mail-in ballots does not appear to have changed the outcome in any federal election. This Court ordered the county boards to segregate ballots received later than the deadline set by the legislature. Order in Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar, No. 20A84. And none of the parties contend that those ballots made an outcome-determinative difference in any relevant federal election.” [Source: The Daily Wire]

Thomas also notes that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision likely did not influence the federal election, or he remarks the change in main-in ballots “does not appear to have changed.” The word “appear” is curious, given that it is deliberately vague … suggesting even Thomas himself has doubts.

These doubts become even clearer as he proceeds in his speech, making it clear that Americans “may not be so lucky in the future.” Thomas also stated that another election result had already been altered by Pennsylvania’s adjusted election laws.

“But we may not be so lucky in the future. Indeed, a separate decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court may have already altered an election result.” [Source: The Daily Wire]

Well, that’s problematic. Laws arbitrarily change, and then someone else inexplicably wins. A bit disturbing, in a way, especially when contemplating the impact on presidential elections.

Which is exactly why Thomas advocates a much greater transparency in terms of what authority non-legislative officials should have to set election rules, and he also believes that they need to do so before the next election.

“These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.” [Source: Town Hall]

Inexplicable, indeed. As well as deliberately planned. Neither adjective, however, warrants preventing Americans from enjoying free, transparent elections.

The SCOTUS Blog also revealed the other dissenters who wished to examine Pennsylvania more closely, particularly with regard to future elections.

“SCOTUS declines to take up a pair of leftover cases from the 2020 election. They involved the authority of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to extend the state’s mail-in ballot deadline. Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch say the court should have granted review.” [Source: Town Hall]

Well, at least Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch stood up for what was right. One can only hope another case will come that the remainder of the SCOTUS cannot just ignore …

At last, some real feedback on the Democrats’ absurd coronavirus bailout package. And the feedback could not be clearer: the “bailout” package is little more than guaranteed unemployment for the American workers that constitute the real backbone of this country, both ethically and economically.

Which is precisely why U.S. Rep, Jason Smith of Missouri, has shredded the Democrats’ COVID relief package for exactly what it is: Nonsense. Job-killing nonsense.

As if the attack on the Keystone XL pipeline isn’t bad enough.

“Democrats are rushing to pass a nearly $2 trillion spending bill that will enact bailouts for state governments that lock down their citizens and radical policies that will destroy jobs and raise the cost of living for working-class Americans …

But this is clearly where any sort of urgency on their part ends … This is all just further proof that COVID-19 is more the pretext than the purpose behind what Democrats are proposing. Their approach is the wrong plan, at the wrong time, for all the wrong reasons.” [Source: Fox News]

Exactly. Triple wrongs, and the Democrats will likely multiply those wrongs well into the future. Just consider Biden’s response to the COVID bailout package, which buggers belief.

“We need Congress to pass my American rescue plan that deals with the immediate crisis, the urgency … Now critics say my plan is too big. That it costs $1.9 trillion. That’s too much. Let me ask them: What would they have me cut?” [Source: Fox News]

What would Americans have you cut? Well, for starters, significant fudning could be cut for schools that refuse to remain open. Instead, billions upon billions are promised to schools, with zero accountability on the schools’ part.

If the teachers unions refuse to send teachers back to work, then who exactly is holding up this “urgency” in responding to the COVID crisis? It surely isn’t the GOP … in fact, maybe teachers unions would get a clue if Biden were to actually stand up to them.

And Psaki predictably offered word salad instead of real commentary on schools. Just a bunch of typical platitudes, as well as the reiteration of some goal of opening schools again by April (yeah, sure).

“That’s our goal. That’s our objective. That’s our plan … And, but what we need and what the President said at the time we need, is funding. That’s why he’s proposed $130 billion in the American Rescue Plan, because many schools across the country don’t have the resources to be able to invest in improving facilities on hiring more bus drivers, on hiring more temporary teachers so we can have smaller class sizes.” [Source: The Daily Wire]

So, in other words, COVID relief is held up over school buses that aren’t even running, as well as “temporary” teachers who aren’t even teaching, as teachers refuse to return back to school. As if repeating leftist, Marxist party lines is so difficult, though it does require getting out of bed in the morning, apparently a real challenge for leftists these days.

Psaki was also asked if reopening schools depended upon the funding in the COVID relief bill, which was especially clear when she replied that schools’ reopening is not “contingent” upon receiving funding.

“That’s not a contingency that we’re putting in, that we’re recommending to go in the bill or in legislation … I think what he believes is that school districts working with our Secretary of Education, who we certainly hope will be confirmed this week, need to make a determination about what works best for them based on the CDC guidelines.” [Source: The Daily Wire]

In other words, no strings funding given to public education, if only to torpedo it to even lower levels than before.
Meanwhile, not only do Americans have schools not reopening to look forward to, but they also have Biden’s ever gloomy commentary to contend with.

“I believe we’ll be approaching normalcy by the end of this year … God willing, this Christmas will be different than last, but I can’t make that commitment to you.” [Source: Fox News]

Right. What exactly can Biden make a “commitment” on?

Apparently, not much … aside from a commitment to job killing.

Despite news reports of growing herd immunity, not to mention dramatically reduced infection rates, Dr. Fauci apparently cannot resist chronically raining on Americans’ parades.

Just consider his recent statements on a hilariously titled “State of the Union” appearance on CNN, where Fauci just could not resist dampening otherwise good news with negativity.

“As we get into the fall and the winter, by the end of the year, I agree with [President Biden] completely, that we will be approaching a degree of normality … It may or may not be precisely the way it was in November of 2019 but it’ll be much much better than we’re doing right now.” [Source: Fox News]

A “degree” of normality. How not comforting. To which “degree” is Dr. Fauci anticipating normalcy? Whatever degree China dictates?

Fauci was also sure to define “normality” as pre-pandemic conditions (you know, freedom conditions), and of course, he suddenly “can’t predict” whether or not full normality will return to the United States by the end of 2021.

He also claims that there may be “a significant degree” of normality, yet he offers about as much detail as Psaki, which means no detail at all.

“It’s important because if normality means exactly the way things were before we had this happen to us, I mean, I can’t predict. I mean, obviously, I think we’ll have a significant degree of normality beyond what the terrible burden that all of us have been through over the last year as we get into the fall.” [Source: Breitbart]

You mean, the “terrible burden” for American workers. Not so much politicians and tech billionaires gallivanting throughout Hawaii and wherever else they please, all while lecturing Americans to imprison themselves in their own homes.

That’s one way to “defund” the justice system. Just have everyone engage in voluntary self-imprisonment.

Fauci made perhaps the most discouraging statement of all when he claimed that everything could change in just a few months, which is probably the most honest statement he made during the entire “State of the Union” discussion on CNN.

“That’s the reason why we’ve got to be careful … Because you have variance that you need to deal with. There are so many other things that would make a projection that I give you today on this Sunday, wind up not being the case six months from now.” [Source: Fox News]

In other words, just like Americans and many others were told that lockdown measures were temporary in 2020, here we are in 2021, with no hope of “normality” (or even a “degree” of normality) until the year’s end, and even that may vanish.

Hence the apparent need for mask wearing in 2022, which Fauci eventually addressed.

“If you combine getting most of the people in the country vaccinated with getting the level of virus in the community very, very low, then I believe you are going to be able to say you know for the most part we don’t necessarily have to wear masks …

When it goes way down, and the overwhelming majority of the people in the population are vaccinated, then I would feel comfortable in saying you know we need to pull back on the masks, we don’t need to have masks.” [Source: Fox News]

Masks into 2022. Great. Way to view the future, but, potentially way for GOP to sweep the House in 2022, along with sweeping all the other leftist nonsense out of public discourse, or at least out of legislation that impacts the public.

Plus, if one really thinks about it … a question does come to mind.

Eh, Fauci? Do Americans really “need to have masks” now, if Biden is supposedly vaccinating every single American that “wants” a vaccine by July? If that is the case, then how will the United States not return to “a degree” of normality until the year’s end?

Furthermore, if the majority of Americans are vaccinated in 2021, then why in the world would masks still be needed at all?

Not exactly a ringing endorsement for the vaccine … or, more accurately, the reality of Biden’s ability to disseminate the vaccine.

Someone please bring about “normality” sooner than Fauci’s predictions. As one can’t be judged for realizing that such “normality” will not ensue for quite some time, if ever, under Democrat “leadership” …

Recently, a federal civil lawsuit, filed by Hannah Gittings and three others, against Kyle Rittenhouse, Facebook, and the Kenosha Guard was dropped, per Kenosha News.

Per the news outlet, the federal civil suit attempted using a federal law from the Reconstruction Era, which was inspired by the rising power of the Ku Klux Klan. This federal law was used to pursue damages from the “commander” of the Kenosha Guard militia Kevin Mathewson; the Boogaloo Bois, known as an anti-government movement; a member of the Boogaloo Boys, a man from West Bend; and Kyle Rittenhouse himself.

The purpose of the lawsuit was to hold Facebook culpable, as the plaintiffs levied accusations against the social media platform for negligence in its failure to respond to the preplanned armed response designed to protect private property and businesses after riots commenced in Kenosha.

One of the individuals Rittenhouse allegedly shot, Anthony Huber, was the boyfriend of Gittings. Huber attacked Rittenhouse while Rittenhouse approached the police on August 25. In addition, Rittenhouse also shot Joseph Rosenbaum and Gaige Grosskreutz, presumably after an attack from Rosenbaum.

After Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum, the following video was developed, which also revealed the second round of shooting, which took place later on.

In terms of RIttenhouse’s criminal trial, a pretrial conference is set for March 10, where Rittenhouse faces charges of first-degree reckless homicide, first-degree intentional homicide, and attempted first-degree reckless endangerment, as well as violations of the city curfew, per NPR.

Well, just when you thought BLM could not get any more insane, they have managed to do exactly that. That said, it is hard to imagine how much more insane they could become.

For instance, as a result of BLM, concepts such as slavery reparations, police abolition, leftist school curriculums, and constant violence have apparently become the norm, not to mention the standard party line of the Democrats.

However, based upon the latest suggestion from another “activist,” it appears that BLM has inspired even more outrageous suggestions for dealing with crime in America’s future. Or, more accurately not dealing with crime.

Just ask Tyree Moorehead, who apparently thinks gang members cannot be stopped.

“I’ve talked to these people. I’ve seen the shooters. It’s a small city, I know who the hustlers are … I can’t stop the shootings, no one in this world has proven to stop the shootings not even the church. But what we can do is put them in compliance …

I can relate to the shooters, guess what they want? They want money.”
[Source: The Blaze]

“No one in the world has proven to stop the shootings?” How about good old law enforcement? Oh, that’s right, BLM and its likeminded followers or supporters are all anti-police.

Never mind the fact that the police, along with the criminal justice system in general, has the tools to “put them in compliance.” After all, why bother having a justice system otherwise?

However, Mr. Cameron apparently thinks that since gang members “want money” (who doesn’t?!), they should apparently be paid to NOT kill someone.

That is not a joke. Mr. Cameron literally believes that people should be paid for not killing someone else. Exactly where is the incentive to pursue an honest living with that type of mindset?!

Needless to say, Mr. Cameron’s suggestion did not sit well with individuals who have lost loved ones due to gang violence, including Lorrain Taylor, who expressed disgust with the asinine pay to not play scheme.

“If I were to find out that the guy who murdered my twin sons was getting a thousand dollars for a promise? I mean, how can you trust? … I mean, if they kill somebody, they will lie.” [Source: The Blaze]

Exactly. If anything, gang members will “double dip” and get paid for assassinations, then lie about the assassinations, earning money for lying. Kind of like ultra-leftist teachers that double-dip in the public schooling system.

In addition, T.J. Smith, a Baltimore PD spokesperson, also detailed how paying gang members will just further incentivize violence, ironically including the ability to purchase more firearms.

“It could make it easier for people to get their hands on guns because they now have an influx of a different level of cash.” [Source: The Blaze]

Sadly, the West Coast is also continuing along its anti-police route, going from defunding the police to apparently attempting to abolish the police entirely. Just ask Joseph Williams, the director of the advocacy group “Students Deserve” in Los Angeles.

“We don’t need police and handcuffs. I speak from personal experience as somebody who was criminalized at 13 years old and spent time in a juvenile detention center and was charged with assault and battery for getting in a fight with another kid.” [Source: The Blaze]

So, what does Los Angeles do? The city hires “climate coaches” instead, which apparently contributes to “racial equity.” (If you’re lost, you’re not the only one).

As noted by a spokesperson for the Los Angeles Unified School Board, Kelly Gonez, these “climate coaches” apparently can serve as a substitute for the police.

“Student safety is everyone’s responsibility and starts with creating a school environment that is centered in students’ social-emotional wellbeing … The Board’s investment in the Black Student Achievement Plan ensures we are actively working to promote equity across the District.” [Source: The Blaze]

Great, Gonez. How about promoting sanity, while you’re at it?

Waiting …

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!