Curiously, in a day and age when the fake news media blasts, “Believe all women” and that “All women should be heard,” despite rather transparent financial or political motivations in more than one case (oftentimes both), the same overly generous treatment does not seem to be awarded to women who upset the fake news media’s increasingly twisted narrative. From Tara Reade to Candace Owens, not to mention legions of other women, the fake news media either largely silences them, in the case of Reade, or openly attacks them, in the case of Owens.
Now that Trump has selected a phenomenal, proudly constitutionalist, female appointee for the Supreme Court, as promised, the fake news media has unsurprisingly, yet unfortunately, launched a full on assault of Amy Cony Barrett. While some of these attacks have predictably targeted Barrett’s strong faith, others are more surprising, even for the fake news media.
In perhaps one of the more egregious, not to mention openly biased attacks on Barrett, a self-proclaimed “antiracist,” Ibram X. Kendi, accused Barrett’s adoption of two Haitian children as … racist.
“Some White colonizers ‘adopted’ Black children. They ‘civilized’ these ‘savage’ children in the ‘superior’ ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity,” Kendi wrote Saturday.
“And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can’t be racist,” Kendi continued.
“I’m challenging the idea that White parents of kids of color are inherently ‘not racist’ and the bots completely change what I’m saying to ‘White parents of kids of color are inherently racist.’ These live and fake bots are good at their propaganda. Let’s not argue with them.” [Source: Fox News]
Uh, ok, Kendi. How about questioning the bots a little less, and yourself a little more for such open ignorance? So, according to your “theories,” children should senselessly suffer, rather than have white parents willing to love and care for them?
The Democrats’ and fake news media’s other attacks have also argued, with zero evidence, that Trump’s relatively quick nomination is “illegitimate.” Only ultra-leftists would label Constitutional doctrine as “illegitimate.”
Too bad the fake news media is so opposed to real history, as some simple fact checking would reveal that eight Supreme Court justices were appointed in just 15 days or less since 1962. Some simply fact checking would also lead to many other self-corrections (before publication) on the media’s part.
In more than one case, the media’s rabid hatred of Trump has blinded them to the facts they are so quick to accuse Trump of obscuring, despite the fact that they themselves have now been fact-checked at least twice: First, Newsweek had to issue a pitiable retraction regarding Barrett; second, California Governor Gavin Newsome was also fact checked by … The Washington Post. When one of the ultimate fake news media outlets actually fact checks a leftist governor, that shows just how unhinged the Democrats have truly become.
Fortunately, no matter how much the fake news media screams and shouts, not to mention the equally intolerant, vastly overprivileged “stars” in Hollywood, Trump has largely blown off their hysterics, just as he’s done all along while acting towards, rather than talking about, fixing serious issues within the United States and abroad. Not only did Trump steward the economy towards the highest point it had been in years, but he also achieved truly unprecedented success abroad in one of the most difficult, perpetually warring regions on the planet.
Effectively zero media attention has been paid to Trump’s landmark peace deals in the Middle East, either out of blind hatred for Trump, or, for the slightly more internally honest, the reality that Obama, along with henchman Hillary, did nothing but develop massive problems and massive enemies. These problems ranged from allowing ISIS to explode, directly contributing to mass terrorist attacks in Europe, to Putin playing Obama like a chump over Syria.
Given the above, along with many more examples, it is highly likely that Trump will secure Barrett’s official appointment to the Supreme Court before the November election. In addition, it is hopefully likely that those who still choose to think should realize that for such a “misogynist,” Trump has demonstrated awfully strong confidence in filling one of the most important seats in the judicial system. He pledged to nominate a female, and he followed through on that promise.
Since the fake news media is now in full-on panic mode over November (why else be so openly desperate to the point that THEY are fact checked?), the more sane realize that their assaults are unlikely to stop anytime soon. Rather than wishing for a cessation of the relentless attacks, the continued assaults will likely serve as another boon to the Republican Party, most of all President Trump.
When Cruz informed the media that it would be an “excellent idea” for the Senate to attempt to obstruct Barrett’s inevitable nomination, he clearly knew exactly what he was talking about.
Too bad the Democrats don’t.