The Obamas just can’t help themselves, can they? Last night’s train wreck of a Democratic National Convention featured dubious headliners such as Sneaky Sanders and Trainwreck Kasich, and of course, some of America’s most famous race-baiters: The Obamas.
While Mr. Obama has been running his mouth for multiple weeks, Ms. Obama apparently cannot resist getting in on the Trump-bashing game as well. Delivering a hysterical speech wherein she mourned the loss of the “freedom” that the Democrats are trying to take away in the first place, Ms. Obama pulled out all the stops for her self-pitying melodrama.
While the entire speech is frankly quite nauseous to read, it becomes particularly unbelievable near the end.
“Empathy: that’s something I’ve been thinking a lot about lately. The ability to walk in someone else’s shoes; the recognition that someone else’s experience has value, too. Most of us practice this without a second thought. If we see someone suffering or struggling, we don’t stand in judgment. We reach out because, “There, but for the grace of God, go I.” It is not a hard concept to grasp. It’s what we teach our children.
And like so many of you, Barack and I have tried our best to instill in our girls a strong moral foundation to carry forward the values that our parents and grandparents poured into us. But right now, kids in this country are seeing what happens when we stop requiring empathy of one another. They’re looking around wondering if we’ve been lying to them this whole time about who we are and what we truly value.” [Source: The New York Times]
Ah. “If we see someone struggling.” Would you be referring to all the “deplorables” who voted in Trump in the first place because they finally saw a candidate who was willing to fight for them and their livelihoods, rather than kowtow to foreign powers and hobnob with celebrities?
Furthermore, Ms. Obama, are you referring that same “empathy” that resulted in the deaths of countless civilians in the Middle East, not to mention the deaths of Americans who Clinton couldn’t be bothered with in Libya? How about the private jets to Africa?
Interesting display of empathy. Even more interesting that the same “moral foundation” is being instilled in your children.
Hilariously, Ms. Obama did not even mention Kamala Harris in her speech, much to the dismay of Donna Brazile, the Former Democratic National Committee interim chairwoman.
“She kept talking about Joe Biden, and she knows Joe Biden very well, but she also knows Kamala Harris, [who was] one of the first to endorse Barack Obama when he ran [for president in 2008], so I was disappointed … I just heard that perhaps she taped the speech before the announcement, but I am disappointed that we did not hear about Kamala Harris …
The first Black first lady of the United States did not mention the first Black female ever to be on a major party ticket,” she emphasized. “So I am a little disappointed that I did not hear that.” [Source: Fox News]
Many might have otherwise attributed the absence of this acknowledgement due to Mr. Obama’s rather well-publicized commentary on Ms. Harris’s physical appearance, which is all the more ironic in the MeToo era. However, as it turns out, Ms. Obama prerecorded her speech and didn’t bother to make any changes to it after Biden announced his unimpressive running mate.
When contemplating the combination of Pelosi, Obama, and Harris, with a sprinkling of AOC and Omar, it is hard to fathom exactly what type of America would thrive under their domain. One thing is for certain: It certainly wouldn’t be an America that promotes freedom and rule of law.
On the contrary, Biden’s America will be one wide open for business from China, provided his volatile, narcotics abusing son receives multiple millions while doing nothing, aside from giving away highly sensitive information regarding the United States.
Furthermore, in states such as California, the government has effectively suffocated private enterprise through various invasive measures, from shutting down all wineries (aside from the governor’s, of course) and churches, all while telling police to stand down while rioters destroy what’s left of Los Angeles.
One could almost view a state like California as a test run for Biden’s (or Obama’s?) America, particularly since both Pelosi and Harris originate from there. That means anyone with any sort of entrepreneurial leaning, or for that matter even a decent work ethic, will not fare well. Criminals and rioters on the other hand? Have at it.
The upside is that Michelle Obama is likely to be unpersuasive to “on the fence” voters, particularly those who do not particularly appreciate the nonstop hatred and racism promoted by the self-proclaimed tolerant left. Of course, Ms. Obama blames Trump for all the violence, despite the violence occurring in the most liberal cities of America.
“Whenever we look to this White House for some leadership or consultation or any semblance of steadiness, what we get instead is chaos, division and a total and utter lack of empathy.” [Source: Fox News]
Actually, Ms. Obama, all America has ever gotten from you is “chaos” and “division.”
In addition, Ms. Obama certainly had no issue with “white privilege” when her husband made hundreds of thousands of dollars in various speeches to the institutions that he bailed out in 2009, and it is quite easy for her to dictate down from her pedestal well above the people about how terrible they are for promoting ongoing racism.
If the U.S. is as “racist” as Ms. Obama claims, it is quite remarkable that her and her husband have been able to amass the millions they’ve made from effectively looting the United States.
Furthermore, the last time anyone checked, there is one party, and one party only that is totally intent on dividing people on the basis of skin pigmentation. And that wouldn’t be the party of President Trump.
However, the silent majority, as in the ones who actually keep the nation afloat, will make their voices heard this November, preferably from within a formal voting location.